These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663576)
1. The Michigan Abortion Refusal Act. White GM Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1975; 8(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11663576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion, conscience and the Constitution: an examination of federal institutional conscience clauses. Pilpel HF; Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):279-305. PubMed ID: 11663597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the state action doctrine compel nominally private hospitals to make abortion services available despite "conscience clauses". Shuger NB Md Law Forum; 1974; 4(3):113-24. PubMed ID: 11663479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutional law--abortion--private hospital may refuse to perform abortion. Berger B St Louis Univ Law J; 1974; 18(3):440-60. PubMed ID: 11663525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accommodation of conscientious objection to abortion: a case study of the nursing profession. Durham WC; Wood MA; Condie SJ Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):253-370. PubMed ID: 11655680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton. Finn J Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospitals--a current analysis of the right to abortions and sterilizations in the Fourth Circuit: state action and the Church Amendment. Malpass S North Carol Law Rev; 1976 Sep; 54(6):1307-16. PubMed ID: 11663711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hill-Burton hospitals after Roe and Doe: can federally funded hospitals refuse to perform abortions? Berl EL Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 11663526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The abortion decisions--how will the United States Supreme Court define "necessary". Duffy MA Women Lawyers J; 1978; 64(1):3-16+. PubMed ID: 11664060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legislation--abortion--Michigan's "conscience clause". Neff JM Wayne Law Rev; 1974 Nov; 21(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 11663559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hathaway v. Worcester City Hospital--the right to be sterilized. Olshin L Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(2):403-12. PubMed ID: 11663627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion. Mahoney HM America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Implications of the abortion decisions: post Roe and Doe litigation and legislation. Wasserman R Columbia Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 74(2):237-68. PubMed ID: 11664412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and sterilization. Pennsylvania. Attorney General Pa Dist Cty Rep; 1975; 70():694-701. PubMed ID: 12038386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion regulation: Louisiana's abortive attempt. Vance RP LA Law Rev; 1974; 34(3):676-85. PubMed ID: 11663504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Can hospitals constitutionally refuse to permit abortions and sterilizations? Gutman JS Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Dec; 2(6):146-8. PubMed ID: 11663517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]