These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663584)
1. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion. Moore EN Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Death before life: abortion as a moral symbol. Frankel LH; Flynn JJ J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):267-85. PubMed ID: 11662359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled. Dworkin R Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-identification and the morality of abortion. Lusby K Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The constitutional morality of abortion. Brownstein A; Dau P Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion rights in America. Bullock JR Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada. McConnell ML Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron. Coleman JJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade. Lockhart T Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Normative judgment, social change, and legal reasoning in the context of abortion and privacy. Schnably SJ Rev Law Soc Change; 1984-1985; 13(4):715-910. PubMed ID: 11659092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who is victim? Hughes G Dalhous Law J; 1974 Oct; 1(3):425-40. PubMed ID: 11660895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Social commentary: values and legal personhood. Parness JA West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law. Cica N Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction. Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]