These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663589)
1. Abortion and the law. Alpern DM Newsweek; 1975 Mar; 85(9):18-19+. PubMed ID: 11663589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Floyd v. Anders. 4 Nov 1977. U.S. District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division Fed Suppl; 1977; 440():535-40. PubMed ID: 11646007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence. Buckley M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commonwealth v. Edelin. 17 Dec 1976. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1976; 359():4-29. PubMed ID: 12038352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment. Witherspoon JS St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion: are medicine and the law on a collision course? Pollner F Med World News; 1985 Jul; 26(13):66-68, 70, 73+. PubMed ID: 11645557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment. Destro RA Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Political effects of court decisions on abortion: a comparison between the United States and the German Federal Republic. George J Int J Law Fam; 1989 Apr; 3(1):106-36. PubMed ID: 11656044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster. Bannon AE; Nigro SA State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Oh my God, I'm pregnant. Minter CV Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism. Westerfield L South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion. Moore EN Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to life in law: the embryo and fetus, the body and soul, the family and society. Hicks SC Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991; 19(3):805-50. PubMed ID: 11656190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]