313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663599)
1. Nor piety nor wit: the Supreme Court on abortion.
Dellapenna JW
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):379-413. PubMed ID: 11663599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion: round 1.
Dworkin R; Kay J; Schnaubelt CM; Orlans H; Rabinowitz S; Bienenstock AH; Bork ME; Lewy G; Hyde HJ; Singer SF; Gellman M; Ewy CR; Gow HB; Jenks BP; Olson E; Wile F; Cohn RG; Oakes ET; Elshtain JB; Wilson JQ
Commentary; 1994 Mar; 97(3):2-19. PubMed ID: 11659743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Death before life: abortion as a moral symbol.
Frankel LH; Flynn JJ
J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):267-85. PubMed ID: 11662359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The constitutional morality of abortion.
Brownstein A; Dau P
Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
Gelinas A
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
Coleman JJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On abortion.
Wilson JQ
Commentary; 1994 Jan; 97(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 11656254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
Tribe LH
Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Congress create people?
Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H
Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
Chemerinsky E
Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Life's Dominion: a review essay.
Bradley GV
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1993; 69(2):329-91. PubMed ID: 11656437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion.
Moore EN
Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
Parness JA
West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment.
Skahn SL
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
Lockhart T
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
Martyn K
UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law.
McCourt KM; Love DJ
Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A human life statute.
Galebach SH
Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(1):5-33. PubMed ID: 11651719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
