128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663611)
21. Abortion: is there a rational precept?
Reiter RC; Johnson SR; Beller FK
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):464-7. PubMed ID: 1876385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Legal considerations and prenatal genetic diagnosis.
Hifman LF
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 19(4):965-72. PubMed ID: 991483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Rabbinic comment: Abortion.
Feldman DM
Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 6608674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Quality-of-life ethics and constitutional jurisprudence: the demise of natural rights and equal protection for the disabled and incompetent.
Destro RA
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():71-130. PubMed ID: 10317804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The abortion debate.
Kent C
Nurs Outlook; 1981 Aug; 29(8):449-51. PubMed ID: 11643884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. When does personhood begin?
Donovan P
Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 6680701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. When the barbarians came.
Francis D
J La State Med Soc; 1973 Apr; 125(4):138-9. PubMed ID: 4691967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A legal analysis of definitions of fetal status.
Capron AM
Clin Res; 1975 Oct; 23(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 10273053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Compelling treatment of the mother to protect the fetus: the limits of personal privacy and paternalism.
Obade CC
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 2131065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The fetus as organ farm.
Fotion N
Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Jun; 9(3):4. PubMed ID: 478839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The new jurisprudence.
Bryn RM
JAMA; 1976 Jul; 236(4):359-60. PubMed ID: 947050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Infanticide: the worth of an infant under law.
Damme C
Med Hist; 1978 Jan; 22(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 345021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomedical ethics.
Walters L
JAMA; 1982 Jun; 247(21):2942-4. PubMed ID: 11643753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of medical technology on the pregnant woman's right to privacy.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):213-32. PubMed ID: 3333216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Half a loaf: a new antiabortion strategy.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Perspect; 1981 Dec; 13(6):262-8. PubMed ID: 7333369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The unborn. Human values and responsibilities.
Tiefel HO
JAMA; 1978 May; 239(21):2263-7. PubMed ID: 650806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The person in abortion.
Clarke L
Nurs Ethics; 1999 Jan; 6(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 10067555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A new ethical approach to abortion and its implications for the euthanasia dispute.
Gardner RF
J Med Ethics; 1975 Sep; 1(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 1214267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of the Supreme Court decisions on the performance of abortions in the United States.
Hirsh HL
Forensic Sci; 1974 Jun; 3(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 4842022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Our curious attitude toward the fetus.
Fost N
Hastings Cent Rep; 1974 Feb; 4(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 4472607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
