These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663614)

  • 21. Abortion.
    Utah
    Utah Code Annot 1953 Utah; 1991; Section 76.7 Pt 3():. PubMed ID: 12043640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Survey of abortion law.
    Platt JG; O'Malley K
    Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abortion: are medicine and the law on a collision course?
    Pollner F
    Med World News; 1985 Jul; 26(13):66-68, 70, 73+. PubMed ID: 11645557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Towards a practical implementation of the abortion decision: the interests of the physician, the woman and the fetus.
    Sebek M
    De Paul Law Rev; 1976; 25(3):676-706. PubMed ID: 11664630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
    Rhoden NK
    Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Missouri's unusual deterrent to abortion fails to get a hearing at the Supreme Court.
    Mintz M
    Washington Post; 1979 Mar; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11648985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Witherspoon JS
    St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Constitutional law: further guidelines for abortion legislation.
    Oklahoma Law Rev; 1976; 29(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 11664737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world.
    Scott TL
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion 1984: the controversy continues.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1984 Apr; 48(4):269. PubMed ID: 11644128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Schulte v. Douglas.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
    Fed Suppl; 1981 Jul; 567():522-9. PubMed ID: 11648342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Criminal abortion revisited.
    Buell SW
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
    Casurella JG; Schrock CT
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abortion statutes after Danforth: an examination.
    Moss GW
    J Fam Law; 1976; 15(3):537-67. PubMed ID: 11663802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.