402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663620)
1. Constitutional amendments relating to abortion.
Bayh B
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Sep; 121(136):S16092-5. PubMed ID: 11663620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
Linton PB
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
Chemerinsky E
Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Amendment No. 336.
Bartlett DF
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
Rhoden NK
Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Casey in the mirror: abortion, abuse and the right to protection in the United States and Germany.
Neuman GL
Am J Comp Law; 1995; 43(2):273-314. PubMed ID: 11656594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law.
McCourt KM; Love DJ
Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response.
Scotland AG
Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
Tribe LH
Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment.
Caron WR
Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
Kindregan CP
Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
Rhoden NK
Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change.
Rubin ER
North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
Hatch OG
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
Minter CV
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
Rice CE
Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reform of German abortion law: first experiences.
Eser A
Am J Comp Law; 1986; 34(2):369-83. PubMed ID: 11655825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
