These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663631)

  • 1. Viability and abortion.
    Macaluso C
    KY Law J; 1975; 64(1):146-64. PubMed ID: 11663631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached.
    Slandell H
    Temple Law Q; 1979; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Roe v. Wade: some definitional considerations.
    Nolan-Haley JM; Hilgers TW
    Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11662326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supreme Court protects physicians performing mid-trimester abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Feb; 8(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11663972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes.
    Bartleman A
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus.
    Wood MA; Hawkins LB
    Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion and human rights.
    Horan DJ; Gorby JD
    Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):21-33. PubMed ID: 11663654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal viability and individual autonomy: resolving medical and legal standards for abortion.
    Cohen LA
    UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Aug; 27(6):1340-64. PubMed ID: 11655391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In high court, state and doctors argue over abortion.
    Mintz M
    Washington Post; 1978 Oct; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11649093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. planned Parenthood v. Danforth: resolving the antinomy.
    Straus TR
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1977; 4(2):425-40. PubMed ID: 11664851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The abortion revolution.
    Newsweek; 1973 Feb; 81(6):27-8. PubMed ID: 11663388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. Supreme Court invalidates law curbing late abortions.
    Goren T
    Ob Gyn News; 1979 Feb; 14(4):1+. PubMed ID: 11661739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
    MacDougal D; Nasser WP
    Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Roe and Doe: substantive due process and the right of abortion.
    Vieira N
    Hastings Law J; 1974 Mar; 25(4):867-79. PubMed ID: 11663480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The "right" to an abortion, the scope of Fourteenth Amendment "personhood," and the Supreme Court's birth requirement.
    Gorby JD
    South Ill Univ Law J; 1979; 1979(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12083082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supreme Court says spouse, parent can't block abortion.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Aug; 5(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 11664665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction of S.J. Res. 140 and S.J. Res. 141.
    Buckley J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Oct; 121(153):S18193-214. PubMed ID: 11663650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion: problems of legal logic.
    Crawford J
    Month; 1980 Apr; 13(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 11655473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diocesan attorneys' papers--abortion and the conscience clause: current status.
    Horan DJ
    Cathol Lawyer; 1974; 20(4):289-302. PubMed ID: 11663555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. State protection of the viable unborn child after Roe v. Wade: how little, how late?
    Rees G
    LA Law Rev; 1976; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 11663713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.