These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663642)

  • 1. The Supreme Court's abortion decisions: some observations on the exercise of judicial review in the United States.
    Grossman JB
    Sven Juristtidn; 1973; 58(6-7):449-62. PubMed ID: 11663642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The gap between law and moral order: an examination of the legitimacy of the Supreme Court abortion decisions.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):811-35. PubMed ID: 11655721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Supreme Court's abortion decisions and public opinion in the United States.
    Blake J
    Popul Dev Rev; 1977; 3(1-2):45-62. PubMed ID: 11664824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change.
    Rubin ER
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High court's abortion rulings: what they mean.
    US News World Rep; 1977 Jul; 83(1):66. PubMed ID: 11663996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Republican schoolmaster: the U.S. Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion.
    Franklin CH; Kosaki LC
    Am Polit Sci Rev; 1989 Sep; 83(3):751-71. PubMed ID: 11656011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion policy in the post-Webster age.
    Halva-Neubauer G
    Publius; 1990; 20(3):27-44. PubMed ID: 11656128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal authority: the United States Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Tyler TR; Mitchell G
    Duke Law J; 1994 Feb; 43(4):703-815. PubMed ID: 11656384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anniversary of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Garn J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Jan; 126(6):S151-2. PubMed ID: 11665215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court, abortion policy, and state response: a preliminary analysis.
    Nicholson JB; Steward DW
    Publius; 1978; 8(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11664024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hathaway v. Worcester City Hospital--the right to be sterilized.
    Olshin L
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(2):403-12. PubMed ID: 11663627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion: should Constitution be amended?
    Loomis D
    Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1975 May; 33(18):917-22. PubMed ID: 11663606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The abortion power.
    Noonan JT
    Hum Life Rev; 1979; 5(2):16-27. PubMed ID: 11663943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion, the public morals, and the police power: the ethical function of substantive due process.
    Perry MJ
    UCLA Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 23(4):689-736. PubMed ID: 11663667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pressure of precedent: a critique of the conservative approaches to stare decisis in abortion cases.
    Gerhardt MJ
    Const Comment; 1993; 10():67-86. PubMed ID: 11656273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Gordon A
    Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A wink from the bench: the federal courts and abortion.
    Uddo BJ
    Tulane Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 53(2):398-464. PubMed ID: 11665104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which way for judicial imperialism?
    Byrn RM
    Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(4):19-35. PubMed ID: 11663790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.