These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663703)

  • 1. roe v. Wade: the rhetoric of fetal life.
    Hagan MR
    Cent States Speech J; 1976; 27(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 11663703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
    Martyn K
    UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Logic, law and abortion.
    Degnan M; Pannier R
    Linacre Q; 1992 Feb; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11652613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The woman's right of privacy.
    Weddington S
    Perkins J; 1973; 27(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 11660987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion: round 1.
    Dworkin R; Kay J; Schnaubelt CM; Orlans H; Rabinowitz S; Bienenstock AH; Bork ME; Lewy G; Hyde HJ; Singer SF; Gellman M; Ewy CR; Gow HB; Jenks BP; Olson E; Wile F; Cohn RG; Oakes ET; Elshtain JB; Wilson JQ
    Commentary; 1994 Mar; 97(3):2-19. PubMed ID: 11659743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
    Parness JA
    West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
    Coleman JJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Constitution and abortion.
    Campbell A
    Mod Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 53(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11656038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
    Riggs T
    San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Death before life: abortion as a moral symbol.
    Frankel LH; Flynn JJ
    J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):267-85. PubMed ID: 11662359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
    Lockhart T
    Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway?
    Gallagher J
    Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reason, revelation and liberal justice: reflections on George Grant's analysis of Roe v. Wade.
    Mathie W
    Can J Polit Sci; 1986 Sep; 19(3):443-66. PubMed ID: 11658853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nor piety nor wit: the Supreme Court on abortion.
    Dellapenna JW
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):379-413. PubMed ID: 11663599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taking rights seriously in the abortion case.
    Dworkin R
    Ratio Juris; 1990 Mar; 3(1):68-80. PubMed ID: 11656052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion and the right of privacy.
    Ortega ML
    Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
    Haley JN
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.