These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663710)
1. Viability, values, and the vast cosmos. Horan DJ Cathol Lawyer; 1976; 22(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11663710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions. Rhoden NK Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New constitutional and penal theory in Spanish abortion law. Stith R Am J Comp Law; 1987; 35(3):513-58. PubMed ID: 11655866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases. Klasing MS Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The legacy of Infant Doe. Cosby MG Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to life in law: the embryo and fetus, the body and soul, the family and society. Hicks SC Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991; 19(3):805-50. PubMed ID: 11656190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion and the law. Alpern DM Newsweek; 1975 Mar; 85(9):18-19+. PubMed ID: 11663589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion. Moore EN Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers. Dougherty CJ Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulating IVF human embryo experimentation: the search for a legal basis. Kasimba P Aust Law J; 1988 Feb; 62(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 11659149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Engelhardt on the abortion and euthanasia of defective infants. Jones GE Linacre Q; 1983 May; 50(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 11653532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Waller, Warnock and Roe v. Wade: variations on the status of the orphan embryo--comment. Van de Weghe B J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():231-54. PubMed ID: 11645586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and euthanasia: common problems--the termination of developing and expiring life. Ehrhardt HE Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):12-31. PubMed ID: 11662180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and euthanasia: recent developments of the law. Horan DJ Forum; 1977; 12(4):960-79. PubMed ID: 11663978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Human being: the boundaries of the concept. Becker LC Philos Public Aff; 1975; 4(2):334-59. PubMed ID: 11663649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sandra Day O'Connor and the justification of abortion. Werhane PH Theor Med; 1984 Oct; 5(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 11644178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and human rights. Horan DJ; Gorby JD Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):21-33. PubMed ID: 11663654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]