215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663731)
1. Abortion and Constitution: United States and West Germany.
Kommers DP
Am J Comp Law; 1977; 25(2):255-85. PubMed ID: 11663731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany.
Morris DG
Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill.
Ruf BA
Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and the right of privacy.
Ortega ML
Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Casey in the mirror: abortion, abuse and the right to protection in the United States and Germany.
Neuman GL
Am J Comp Law; 1995; 43(2):273-314. PubMed ID: 11656594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion.
Moore EN
Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada.
McConnell ML
Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law.
McCourt KM; Love DJ
Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Introduction to the translation of the abortion decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Gorby JD
John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1976; 9(3):557-94. PubMed ID: 11663651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The politics of abortion.
Gearty C
J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The wisdom of the Supreme Court decision on abortion.
Packwood RW
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Mar; 121(39):S3644-68. PubMed ID: 11664533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
Lockhart T
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
Coleman JJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
Parness JA
West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics.
Tatalovich R; Daynes BW
Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right over one's own body: its scope and limits in comparative law.
Meulders-Klein MT
Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(1):29-79. PubMed ID: 11655891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Senate Joint Resolution 10 and Senate Joint Resolution 11--right to life amendments.
Buckley J
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Jan; 121(7):S651-72. PubMed ID: 11663644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law.
Cica N
Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
