649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663756)
1. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
Butler PA
Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
Finn J
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Amendment No. 336.
Bartlett DF
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Survey of abortion law.
Platt JG; O'Malley K
Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
Wilcox JK
Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to abortion under Medicaid.
Butler PA
Clgh Rev; 1974 Apr; 7(12):713-20. PubMed ID: 11663473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment.
Skahn SL
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hope v. Perales: expanding medically necessary abortion rights of pregnant indigent women under New York and Nebraska state constitutional due process clauses.
Brown M
Neb Law Rev; 1993; 72(2):586-607. PubMed ID: 11656347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
Nishi J
Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
Corns CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Barnett BA
Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
Yarbrough TE
North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
Hendrickson E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Gray AD
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Indigent women--what right to abortion?
Friedman BW
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1978; 23(4):709-41. PubMed ID: 11662584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional law--denial of state Medicaid funds for abortions not 'medically necessary' does not violate the equal protection clause.
Barber CK
Howard Law J; 1978; 21(3):937-54. PubMed ID: 11663935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicaid and the abortion right.
Blauner MA
George Washington Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 44(3):404-17. PubMed ID: 11662252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade.
Brock VM
Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The constitutionality of the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993.
Axel DA
Hastings Law J; 1994; 45(3):641-65. PubMed ID: 11656418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
