BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

687 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663761)

  • 1. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
    Jubb ED
    Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
    Destro RA
    Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill.
    Ruf BA
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protection of the unborn--introduction of a joint resolution.
    Buckley JL
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 May; 119(82):S9973-92. PubMed ID: 11663377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
    Tribe LH
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
    Witherspoon JP
    Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The decline of personhood.
    Wauck J
    Hum Life Rev; 1988; 14(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 11655918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Homo sapienism: critique of Roe v. Wade and abortion.
    Lewis JL
    Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):856-93. PubMed ID: 11661205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
    Rubenfeld J
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
    Riggs T
    San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The politics of abortion.
    Gearty C
    J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Senate Joint Resolution 10 and Senate Joint Resolution 11--right to life amendments.
    Buckley J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Jan; 121(7):S651-72. PubMed ID: 11663644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction to the translation of the abortion decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany.
    Gorby JD
    John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1976; 9(3):557-94. PubMed ID: 11663651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Witherspoon JS
    St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On a constitutional amendment protecting unborn human life.
    United States Catholic Conference
    Cathol Mind; 1974 Oct; 72(1286):43-64. PubMed ID: 11661138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion and the right of privacy.
    Ortega ML
    Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion and the Hatch Amendment.
    Bryce E
    America (NY); 1982 Mar; 146(9):166-8. PubMed ID: 11658309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
    Rush SE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.