These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
687 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663761)
41. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics. Tatalovich R; Daynes BW Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The Canadian abortion quagmire: the way in and a way out. Hunter IA Can Fam Law Q; 1990; 6():57-78. PubMed ID: 11656050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The abortion decision: two years later. Dred Scott revisited. Trinkaus WR Commonweal; 1975 Feb; 101(14):384+. PubMed ID: 11663609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Judicial power and the right to life. Noonan JT Tablet; 1973 Apr; 227(6927):323-6. PubMed ID: 11660868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The constitutional validity of abortion legislation: a comparative note. Glenn HP McGill Law J; 1975; 21(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 11663622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Proposed right of life amendment to the Constitution. Helms Je Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1976 Apr; 122(60):S6116-42. PubMed ID: 11663749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The abortion amendments: policy in the light of precedent. Byrn RM St Louis Univ Law J; 1974; 18(3):380-406. PubMed ID: 11663524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy. Haley JN Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. How to argue about abortion: continuing the discussion. Burtchaell JT Christ Crisis; 1977 Dec; 37(21):313-6. PubMed ID: 11663816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The Borowski case. Shumiatcher MC Rev Gen Droit; 1989; 20():299-324. PubMed ID: 11656436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. New constitutional and penal theory in Spanish abortion law. Stith R Am J Comp Law; 1987; 35(3):513-58. PubMed ID: 11655866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Abortion and Constitution: United States and West Germany. Kommers DP Am J Comp Law; 1977; 25(2):255-85. PubMed ID: 11663731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Abortion and degrees of personhood: understanding why the abortion problem (and the animal rights problem) are irresolvable. Li HL Public Aff Q; 1997 Jan; 11(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11656703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The abortion decision: a balancing of rights. Evans JC Christ Century; 1973 Feb; 90(7):195-7. PubMed ID: 11663384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Abortion and human rights. Horan DJ; Gorby JD Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):21-33. PubMed ID: 11663654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. A beau mentir qui vient de loin: the 1988 Canadian abortion decision in comparative perspective. Glendon MA Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1989; 83(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11655964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. byrn and Roe: the threshold question and juridical review. Riga PJ Cathol Lawyer; 1978; 23(4):309-31. PubMed ID: 11664059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]