These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663842)
21. Indigent women--what right to abortion? Friedman BW NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1978; 23(4):709-41. PubMed ID: 11662584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A critique of the abortion funding decisions: on private rights in the public sector. Goldstein LF Hastings Constit Law Q; 1981; 8(2):313-42. PubMed ID: 11655390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion, poverty and the equal protection of the laws. Simson GJ Georgia Law Rev; 1979; 13(2):505-14. PubMed ID: 11664056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade. Brock VM Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae. Gold RB Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Poor women get word on health from Court. Mann J Washington Post; 1980 Jul; ():B1, B3. PubMed ID: 11647332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton. Finn J Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Limiting public funds for abortions: state response to Congressional action. Dickinson TM Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):923-59. PubMed ID: 11664055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The moral interest of the state in abortion funding: a comment on Beal, Maher and Poelker. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1979; 22(4):566-81. PubMed ID: 11663938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion and the law in 1980. Paul EW; Schaap P NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Government funding, abortions, and the public forum. Canby WC Ariz State Law J; 1979; 1979(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 11664054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medicaid not required to fund medically necessary abortions. Annas GJ Nurs Law Ethics; 1980 Oct; 1(8):3+. PubMed ID: 12085918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Hyde Amendment: new implications for equal protection claims. Boyd LP Bayl Law Rev; 1981; 33(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 11655484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Carter traps self on abortion issue. Hum Events; 1977 Jul; 37(27):500-1. PubMed ID: 11663812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The denial of Medi-Cal funds for abortion: an establishment of religion. Symonds E Gold Gate Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):421-49. PubMed ID: 11664071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]