These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663853)
1. Human rights, abortion and the law. Sharkey PW Philos Res Analysis; 1978; 7(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 11663853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion and privacy: a woman's right to self determination. Kraus AR Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1978; 10(1):173-93. PubMed ID: 11664982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproduction and the law. Erickson NS Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutional law--abortion--court focuses on husband's interest regarding spousal notification requirement to procure abortion: Scheinberg v. Smith, 659 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1981). Adams C Cumberland Law Rev; 1982-1983; 13(1):143-59. PubMed ID: 11658434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Justice Harry A. Blackmun: the abortion decisions. Fuqua D Ark Law Rev; 1980; 34(2):276-96. PubMed ID: 11658349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The husband's rights in abortion. Etzioni A Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The father's rights in the abortion decision. Schultz WL Tex Tech Law Rev; 1975; 6(3):1075-94. PubMed ID: 11664508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to an abortion--problems with parental and spousal consent. Goldbach V NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1976; 22(1):65-86. PubMed ID: 11664694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy. Long SL; Ravenscraft P Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Embryo transplant, parental conflict, and reproductive freedom: a prospective analysis of issues and arguments created by forthcoming technology. Coleman MN Hofstra Law Rev; 1987; 15(3):609-30. PubMed ID: 11659072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine. Brownstein A Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role. Witherspoon JP Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say? Diggins M Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The family at bay. DeMarco D Hum Life Rev; 1982; 8(4):44-54. PubMed ID: 11651705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Workability of the undue burden test. Schneider EA Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion, parental burdens, and the right to choose: is a penumbral or Ninth-Amendment right about to arise from the ashes of a common law liberty? Swan GS Case Comment; 1977; 82(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 11664856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice. Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond roe and doe: the rights of the father. Sherain H Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Feb; 50(3):483-95. PubMed ID: 11663632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]