159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663906)
1. Ordinance on informed consent for abortion described as immoral, an encroachment.
Delmar D
Ob Gyn News; 1978 Oct; 13(20):1+. PubMed ID: 11663906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.
Diamond E
New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Social abortion and medical paternalism.
Bannon A; O'Donnell A
Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 11655582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
Sangree S
Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Wolfe v. Schroering. 18 Aug 1976.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Fed Report; 1976; 541():523-8. PubMed ID: 11646058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of state abortion laws enacted since January 1973.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):108-13. PubMed ID: 11664490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
MacDougal D; Nasser WP
Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pregnancy and abortion in adolescence: a comparative legal survey and proposals for reform.
Lee LT; Paxman JM
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):307-55. PubMed ID: 11664497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutional law: further guidelines for abortion legislation.
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1976; 29(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 11664737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Abortion and Sterilization Act 2 of 1975: a third opinion (part II).
Bertrand AR
S Afr Tydskr Strafr Kriminol; 1978 Nov; 2(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 12091956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The need for regulation of artificial insemination by donor.
Doren RJ
San Diego Law Rev; 1985; 22(5):1193-218. PubMed ID: 11658748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The future of fetal research in California: a proposal for change.
Lehmann PL
San Diego Law Rev; 1978 Jul; 15(4):859-86. PubMed ID: 11664975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspectives on the abortion decision.
Noble CF
N M Law Rev; 1978 Winter 1978; 9(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 11665182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Compulsory sterilization.
India. Maharashtra
Int Dig Health Legis; 1976; 27(4):779-88. PubMed ID: 11663701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
Long SL; Ravenscraft P
Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court says spouse, parent can't block abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Aug; 5(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 11664665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sterilization regulation: government efforts to guarantee informed consent.
Prendergast MH
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1978; 18(4):971-96. PubMed ID: 11665024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. France: the automatic transplant.
Raymond A
Washington Post; 1978 Aug; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11648945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
