These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663932)

  • 1. Departments of Labor and Health, Education, and Welfare Appropriations Bill, 1979.
    U.S. Congress. House
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1978 Jun; 124(90):H5355-71. PubMed ID: 11663932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conference report on H.R. 12929, Labor-HEW appropriations.
    U.S. Congress. House
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1978 Oct; 124(166):H12513-20. PubMed ID: 11663934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The racially disparate impact of restrictions on the public funding of abortion: an analysis of current equal protection doctrine.
    Baron DR
    Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1993; 13(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11656354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
    Corns CA
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Federal funding of abortions.
    Packwood RW
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Apr; 123(64):S5933-5. PubMed ID: 11663784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The second victory of Anthony Comstock?
    Polenberg R
    Society; 1982; 19(4):32-8. PubMed ID: 11650596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amendment No. 336.
    Bartlett DF
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The abortion funding conundrum: inalienable rights, affirmative duties, and the dilemma of dependence.
    Tribe LH
    Harv Law Rev; 1985 Nov; 99(1):330-43. PubMed ID: 11655827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity, under Federal Constitution, of abortion laws.
    Shapiro SR
    US Supreme Court Rep; 1974; 35():735-69. PubMed ID: 11663483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The unborn and the born again.
    New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom.
    Ellis DA
    Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The abortion debate: the search for common ground, part 2.
    Davis NA
    Ethics; 1993 Jul; 103(4):731-78. PubMed ID: 11656201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Federal funds for abortion.
    Packwood RW
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1979 Jul; 125(98):S9850-74. PubMed ID: 11664023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
    Erca A
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Departments of Labor and Health, Education, and Welfare, and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1978.
    Flood DJ
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Jun; 123(105):H6082-99. PubMed ID: 11663848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amendment No. 2413 [(abortion funding[.
    Weicker LP
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Sep; 126(152):S13703-11. PubMed ID: 11664172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward a Thomistic perspective on abortion and the law in contemporary America.
    Kaveny MC
    Thomist; 1991 Jul; 55(3):343-96. PubMed ID: 11656147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion laws: comparative and feminist perspectives in Australia, England and the United States.
    Petersen K
    Med Law Int; 1996; 2(2):77-105. PubMed ID: 11657551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion, asking the rights question?
    McMahon JA
    Law Rev; 1988 Aug; 18(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 11655984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.