These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663932)
1. Departments of Labor and Health, Education, and Welfare Appropriations Bill, 1979. U.S. Congress. House Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1978 Jun; 124(90):H5355-71. PubMed ID: 11663932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Conference report on H.R. 12929, Labor-HEW appropriations. U.S. Congress. House Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1978 Oct; 124(166):H12513-20. PubMed ID: 11663934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The racially disparate impact of restrictions on the public funding of abortion: an analysis of current equal protection doctrine. Baron DR Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1993; 13(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11656354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions. Corns CA Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The abortion funding conundrum: inalienable rights, affirmative duties, and the dilemma of dependence. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1985 Nov; 99(1):330-43. PubMed ID: 11655827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests. Jones CJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity, under Federal Constitution, of abortion laws. Shapiro SR US Supreme Court Rep; 1974; 35():735-69. PubMed ID: 11663483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The unborn and the born again. New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom. Ellis DA Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The abortion debate: the search for common ground, part 2. Davis NA Ethics; 1993 Jul; 103(4):731-78. PubMed ID: 11656201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women. Erca A Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Departments of Labor and Health, Education, and Welfare, and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1978. Flood DJ Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Jun; 123(105):H6082-99. PubMed ID: 11663848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward a Thomistic perspective on abortion and the law in contemporary America. Kaveny MC Thomist; 1991 Jul; 55(3):343-96. PubMed ID: 11656147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion laws: comparative and feminist perspectives in Australia, England and the United States. Petersen K Med Law Int; 1996; 2(2):77-105. PubMed ID: 11657551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion, asking the rights question? McMahon JA Law Rev; 1988 Aug; 18(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 11655984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]