These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663939)

  • 1. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton revisited in 1976 and 1977--reviewed?; revived?; revested?; reversed?; or revoked?
    Susman F
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1979; 22(4):581-95. PubMed ID: 11663939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade.
    Brock VM
    Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
    Hendrickson E
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The culmination of the abortion reform movement--Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton.
    Bayliss WD
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1973; 8(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 11663507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Libby FA
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Harris v. McRae: whatever happened to the Roe v. Wade abortion right?
    Crocker L
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1981; 8(3):861-97. PubMed ID: 11650497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
    Wilcox JK
    Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Gray AD
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
    Yarbrough TE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Will there be a constitutional right to abortion after the reconsideration of Roe v. Wade?
    Bopp J
    J Contemp Law; 1989; 15(2):131-73. PubMed ID: 11655991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
    Butler PA
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Denial of public funds for nontherapeutic abortions.
    Stingle KD
    Conn Law Rev; 1978; 10(2):487-510. PubMed ID: 11663904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Privacy and abortion rights under the Louisiana state constitution: could Roe v. Wade be alive and well in the Bayou state?
    Devlin J
    LA Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 51(4):685-732. PubMed ID: 11656097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Closing the circle of constitutional review from Griswold v. Connecticut to Roe v. Wade: an outline of a decision merely overruling Roe.
    Van Alstyne W
    Duke Law J; 1989 Dec; 1989(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 11656009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A right without access? Payment for elective abortions after Maher v. Roe.
    Ryan JS
    Cap Univ Law Rev; 1978; 7(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 11663178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall.
    Sewell CC; Wetterer MA
    KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of recent Medicaid decisions on a constitutional right: abortions only for the rich?
    Lalli MA
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1978; 6(3):687-710. PubMed ID: 11663905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.