These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663956)
1. Medicaid funding for abortions: the Medicaid statute and the equal protection clause. Felder AB Hofstra Law Rev; 1978; 6(2):421-43. PubMed ID: 11663956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Constitutional law--denial of state Medicaid funds for abortions not 'medically necessary' does not violate the equal protection clause. Barber CK Howard Law J; 1978; 21(3):937-54. PubMed ID: 11663935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law: state funding of nontherapeutic abortions--Medicaid plans--equal protection--right to choose an abortion. Leistiko C Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(2):345-58. PubMed ID: 11663842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. State funding of elective abortion: the Supreme Court defers to the legislature. Russo WF Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1978; 46(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 11663849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Gray AD Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions. Gunty S Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection. Wilcox JK Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues. Yarbrough TE North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion, Medicaid, and the Constitution. N Y Univ Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 54(1):120-60. PubMed ID: 11663947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion. Hendrickson E Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional law: denial of state funding of non-therapeutic abortions to indigent women. Harrison TH Stetson Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):247-58. PubMed ID: 11663966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A right without access? Payment for elective abortions after Maher v. Roe. Ryan JS Cap Univ Law Rev; 1978; 7(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 11663178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade. Brock VM Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A critique of the abortion funding decisions: on private rights in the public sector. Goldstein LF Hastings Constit Law Q; 1981; 8(2):313-42. PubMed ID: 11655390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall. Sewell CC; Wetterer MA KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion. Butler PA Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Barnett BA Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Indigent women--what right to abortion? Friedman BW NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1978; 23(4):709-41. PubMed ID: 11662584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]