These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663956)
21. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton. Finn J Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980). Brath MS Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Abortion, poverty and the equal protection of the laws. Simson GJ Georgia Law Rev; 1979; 13(2):505-14. PubMed ID: 11664056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Government funding, abortions, and the public forum. Canby WC Ariz State Law J; 1979; 1979(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 11664054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Hyde Amendment: an infringement upon the free exercise clause? Biskin JC Rutgers Law Rev; 1981; 33(4):1054-75. PubMed ID: 11655472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Constitutional law--abortion--no requirement to provide Medicaid funds for nontherapeutic abortions under Title XIX of the Social Security Act of 1965 or the Fourteenth Amendment. Okerson EC Tulane Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 52(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 11663846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The moral interest of the state in abortion funding: a comment on Beal, Maher and Poelker. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1979; 22(4):566-81. PubMed ID: 11663938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The denial of Medi-Cal funds for abortion: an establishment of religion. Symonds E Gold Gate Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):421-49. PubMed ID: 11664071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Libby FA Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The unborn and the born again. New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion. Mahoney HM America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Harris v. McRae: whatever happened to the Roe v. Wade abortion right? Crocker L Pepperdine Law Rev; 1981; 8(3):861-97. PubMed ID: 11650497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. beal v. Doe, Maher v. Roe, and non-therapeutic abortions: the state does not have to pay the bill. Norman AB Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1977; 9(1):288-311. PubMed ID: 11661567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Limiting public funds for abortions: state response to Congressional action. Dickinson TM Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):923-59. PubMed ID: 11664055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Reproductive freedom issues in legal services practice. Law S Clgh Rev; 1978 Nov; 12(7):389-403. PubMed ID: 11665039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae. Gold RB Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Carter traps self on abortion issue. Hum Events; 1977 Jul; 37(27):500-1. PubMed ID: 11663812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Is abortion a religious issue? Introduction. Steinfels M Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Aug; 8(4):12. PubMed ID: 11643475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]