These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663966)

  • 1. Constitutional law: denial of state funding of non-therapeutic abortions to indigent women.
    Harrison TH
    Stetson Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):247-58. PubMed ID: 11663966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constitutional law--denial of state Medicaid funds for abortions not 'medically necessary' does not violate the equal protection clause.
    Barber CK
    Howard Law J; 1978; 21(3):937-54. PubMed ID: 11663935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional law: state funding of nontherapeutic abortions--Medicaid plans--equal protection--right to choose an abortion.
    Leistiko C
    Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(2):345-58. PubMed ID: 11663842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A critique of the abortion funding decisions: on private rights in the public sector.
    Goldstein LF
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1981; 8(2):313-42. PubMed ID: 11655390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Libby FA
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
    Hendrickson E
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
    Yarbrough TE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).
    Brath MS
    Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The moral interest of the state in abortion funding: a comment on Beal, Maher and Poelker.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1979; 22(4):566-81. PubMed ID: 11663938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion and the law in 1980.
    Paul EW; Schaap P
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools.
    McConnell MW
    Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Gray AD
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion, poverty and the equal protection of the laws.
    Simson GJ
    Georgia Law Rev; 1979; 13(2):505-14. PubMed ID: 11664056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medicaid funding for abortions: the Medicaid statute and the equal protection clause.
    Felder AB
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1978; 6(2):421-43. PubMed ID: 11663956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indigent women--what right to abortion?
    Friedman BW
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1978; 23(4):709-41. PubMed ID: 11662584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. State funding of elective abortion: the Supreme Court defers to the legislature.
    Russo WF
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1978; 46(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 11663849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A right without access? Payment for elective abortions after Maher v. Roe.
    Ryan JS
    Cap Univ Law Rev; 1978; 7(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 11663178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions.
    Gunty S
    Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton revisited in 1976 and 1977--reviewed?; revived?; revested?; reversed?; or revoked?
    Susman F
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1979; 22(4):581-95. PubMed ID: 11663939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.