These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached. Slandell H Temple Law Q; 1979; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Court voids state curb on abortion. Mintz M Washington Post; 1979 Jan; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11649080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In high court, state and doctors argue over abortion. Mintz M Washington Post; 1978 Oct; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11649093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe. Sendor BB Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. Supreme Court invalidates law curbing late abortions. Goren T Ob Gyn News; 1979 Feb; 14(4):1+. PubMed ID: 11661739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Colautti v. Franklin. 9 Jan 1979. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court Rep; 1979; 439():379-409. PubMed ID: 11646023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus. Wood MA; Hawkins LB Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion: 'settling' the issue. Will GF Washington Post; 1979 Jan; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11649082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. planned Parenthood v. Danforth: resolving the antinomy. Straus TR Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1977; 4(2):425-40. PubMed ID: 11664851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Viability and abortion. Macaluso C KY Law J; 1975; 64(1):146-64. PubMed ID: 11663631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court kills law calling late abortions murder. Med World News; 1979 Feb; 20(3):85-6. PubMed ID: 11645393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention. MacDougal D; Nasser WP Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Court affirms physician's choice of abortion procedure. Stiller JA Hosp Med Staff; 1979 Oct; 8(10):10-2. PubMed ID: 10244309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal viability and individual autonomy: resolving medical and legal standards for abortion. Cohen LA UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Aug; 27(6):1340-64. PubMed ID: 11655391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. State protection of the viable unborn child after Roe v. Wade: how little, how late? Rees G LA Law Rev; 1976; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 11663713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Torts--wrongful death--recovery for wrongful death of a stillborn fetus examined. Cherken HS Villanova Law Rev; 1976 Oct; 21(5-6):994-1005. PubMed ID: 11664726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes. Bartleman A West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]