These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663996)
1. High court's abortion rulings: what they mean. US News World Rep; 1977 Jul; 83(1):66. PubMed ID: 11663996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court's abortion decisions: some observations on the exercise of judicial review in the United States. Grossman JB Sven Juristtidn; 1973; 58(6-7):449-62. PubMed ID: 11663642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court, abortion policy, and state response: a preliminary analysis. Nicholson JB; Steward DW Publius; 1978; 8(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11664024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court's abortion rulings and social change. Brady DW; Kemp K Soc Sci Q; 1976 Dec; 57(3):535-46. PubMed ID: 11663700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court's abortion decisions and public opinion in the United States. Blake J Popul Dev Rev; 1977; 3(1-2):45-62. PubMed ID: 11664824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment. Skahn SL Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Law, morals and abortion: alternatives in light of the Supreme Court's decision. Degnan DA Commonweal; 1974 May; 100(13):305-8. PubMed ID: 11663441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Court clears Hill curb on U.S. abortion aid: rulings muddle issue. Colen BD; MacPherson M Washington Post; 1977 Jun; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11649058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Implications of the abortion decisions: post Roe and Doe litigation and legislation. Wasserman R Columbia Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 74(2):237-68. PubMed ID: 11664412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. USA and abortion. Noonan JT Tablet; 1976 May; 230(7079):494-6. PubMed ID: 11662284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion: new phase in the battle. Noonan JT Natl Rev; 1978 Mar; 30(9):279-280+. PubMed ID: 11663886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 'Hyde decision denies equal health care access'. Branch De Ob Gyn News; 1980 Aug; 15(15):1+. PubMed ID: 11664010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion: should Constitution be amended? Loomis D Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1975 May; 33(18):917-22. PubMed ID: 11663606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Limiting public funds for abortions: state response to Congressional action. Dickinson TM Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):923-59. PubMed ID: 11664055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Parent, child, and the decision to abort: a critique of the Supreme Court's statutory proposal in Bellotti v. Baird. Watts WW South Calif Law Rev; 1979 Sep; 52(6):1869-915. PubMed ID: 11665145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Carter traps self on abortion issue. Hum Events; 1977 Jul; 37(27):500-1. PubMed ID: 11663812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]