These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664055)

  • 1. Limiting public funds for abortions: state response to Congressional action.
    Dickinson TM
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):923-59. PubMed ID: 11664055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
    Butler PA
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Gray AD
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions.
    Gunty S
    Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Supreme Court, abortion policy, and state response: a preliminary analysis.
    Nicholson JB; Steward DW
    Publius; 1978; 8(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11664024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion, Medicaid, and the Constitution.
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 54(1):120-60. PubMed ID: 11663947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. S. 2372--federal abortion funding restriction.
    Hatfield MO
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1982 Apr; 128(41):S3557-61. PubMed ID: 11655634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Government funding, abortions, and the public forum.
    Canby WC
    Ariz State Law J; 1979; 1979(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 11664054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amendment No. 336.
    Bartlett DF
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critique of the abortion funding decisions: on private rights in the public sector.
    Goldstein LF
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1981; 8(2):313-42. PubMed ID: 11655390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae.
    Gold RB
    Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall.
    Sewell CC; Wetterer MA
    KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
    Yarbrough TE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
    Hendrickson E
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In spite of ban, U.S. funds 1,000 abortions a week.
    Rich S; Dugger CW
    Washington Post; 1980 Aug; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11647327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. States needn't fund elective abortions for low-income women, Justices rule.
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1977 Jun; ():2. PubMed ID: 11649051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).
    Brath MS
    Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.