578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664058)
21. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A survey of the legal, ethical, and public policy considerations of in vitro fertilization.
McCartan MK
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):695-731. PubMed ID: 11650889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity.
O'Brien S
Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: fertile areas for litigation.
Lorio KV
Southwest Law J; 1982 Feb; 35(5):973-1011. PubMed ID: 11658618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Developing a concept of the modern "family": a proposed Uniform Surrogate Parenthood Act.
Mandler JJ
Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1283-329. PubMed ID: 11651810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law.
Wadlington W
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Social values in a brave new world: toward a public policy regarding embryo status and in vitro fertilization.
Dickman DG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):817-51. PubMed ID: 11649208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The embryo as a legal entity -- woman as a fetal environment: the new German laws on reproductive engineering and embryo research.
Waldschmidt A
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 11651216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying.
Robichaud TD
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Artificial human reproduction: legal problems presented by the test tube baby.
Steeves SM
Emory Law J; 1979; 28(4):1045-79. PubMed ID: 11665235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
Lieber KB
Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. House Joint Resolution 372: the Human Life Federalism Amendment.
Ashbrook JM
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Dec; 127(185):H9407-9. PubMed ID: 11652376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Test tube babies: proposals for legal regulation of new methods of human conception and prenatal development.
Oakley MA
Fam Law Q; 1974; 8(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 11661115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
Long SL; Ravenscraft P
Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Equality of rights under the law: state constitutional protection for abortion rights in Maryland and beyond.
Forman S
Wis Womens Law J; 1991; 6():87-117. PubMed ID: 11656290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion, conscience and the Constitution: an examination of federal institutional conscience clauses.
Pilpel HF; Patton DE
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):279-305. PubMed ID: 11663597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Law for protection of embryos.
Germany
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
Wilson JP
Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Prohibiting payments to surrogate mothers: love's labor lost and the constitutional right to privacy.
Bradley TS
John Marshall Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):715-45. PubMed ID: 11650095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The new Spanish law: a model for Europe?
Varela MJ; Stolcke V
Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
