These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664062)

  • 21. Who should control genetic research?
    Jones C
    Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 1977 Feb; ():9. PubMed ID: 11648709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. International and European regulation of recombinant DNA research.
    Tooze J
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):869-90. PubMed ID: 11649589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Foreign countries weigh uniform rules on DNA studies.
    Fields CM
    Chron High Educ; 1977 Apr; 14(7):3. PubMed ID: 11662376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Better biosafe than sorry.
    Munson A
    New Sci; 1994 Jun; 142(1931):47-8. PubMed ID: 11656417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Symposium. Biotechnology and the law: recombinant DNA and the control of scientific research.
    South Calif Law Rev; 1978 Sep; 51(6):969-1573. PubMed ID: 11661667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hazardous biological activities in outer space.
    McGarrigle P
    Akron Law Rev; 1984; 18(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 11658579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. New guidelines for Britain's genetic engineers.
    Lewin R
    New Sci; 1979 Feb; 81(1142):459. PubMed ID: 11663910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Regulation of recombinant DNA research: a comparative study.
    Teichmann DL
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1983; 6(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 15739273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic manipulation: guidelines out.
    Lawrence E
    Nature; 1976 Sep; 263(5572):4-5. PubMed ID: 11643332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The end of Britain's genetic engineering watchdog?
    New Sci; 1980 Dec; 88(1231):694. PubMed ID: 11664096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gene manipulation watchdog: too smooth?
    Nature; 1982 Mar; 296(5854):189. PubMed ID: 11643724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recombinant DNA--rules without enforcement?
    Dixon B
    New Sci; 1976 Jan; 69(985):218. PubMed ID: 11663661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New genetic technologies: prospects and hazards.
    King J
    Technol Rev; 1980 Feb; 82(4):57-61, 64-65. PubMed ID: 11645417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Looser rules tempt genetic engineers East.
    Watts S
    New Sci; 1990 Jan; 125(1700):22. PubMed ID: 11655939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Europe fails to agree on biotech rules.
    Conzelmann C; Claveloux D
    New Sci; 1986 Jul; 111(1516):19-20. PubMed ID: 11655773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. New kennel for genetic engineering watchdog?
    New Sci; 1979 Dec 20-27; 84(1186-1187):926. PubMed ID: 11664018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Keeping an eye on genetic engineering.
    Times (Lond); 1976 p 13; 26 Aug 1976():. PubMed ID: 11661457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. MPs probe social consequences of genetic engineering.
    New Sci; 1978 Dec 21-28; 80(1134):915. PubMed ID: 11663897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regulation of genetic modification of organisms: science or emotion?
    Malinowski MJ
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 11657280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. British solution to genetic engineering.
    Wolstenholme G
    New Sci; 1979 Mar; 82(1148):1037-8. PubMed ID: 11663913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.