These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664063)

  • 21. Patent protection for biological inventions--review of recent case law in EEC countries.
    Vossius V
    Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1979 Oct; 1():278-82. PubMed ID: 11662912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biotechnology patent law developments in Great Britain and the United States: analysis of a hypothetical patent claim for a synthesized virus.
    Auerbach BC
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(2):563-90. PubMed ID: 11649615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A matter of life and patents.
    Watts S
    New Sci; 1991 Jan; 129(1751):56-61. PubMed ID: 11659287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diamond v. Chakrabarty: scientist patents micro-organism--life forms considered patentable subject matter.
    Kiernan JM
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 7(4):1038-51. PubMed ID: 11650472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Where was Chakrabarty's bug?
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4907):919. PubMed ID: 11644372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patent law--life forms found to be within the ambit of Section 101 of the Patent Code.
    Wolfe CH
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1980-1981; 11(3):775-98. PubMed ID: 11650571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Europe tries to untangle laws on patenting life.
    Dickson D
    Science; 1989 Feb; 243(4894):1002-3. PubMed ID: 11653832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patenting human genes in Europe -- past developments and prospects for the future.
    Straus J
    IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1995 Dec; 26(6):920-50. PubMed ID: 11660651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patents showdown.
    Emmott S
    Splice Life; 1998; 4(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11657658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New life forms: a clear road ahead?
    US News World Rep; 1980 Jun; 88(25):34-5. PubMed ID: 11661843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patent decision fuels genetic research debate.
    Podgers J
    Am Bar Assoc J; 1980 Aug; 66():943-4. PubMed ID: 11662811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are living organisms proper subject matter for a patent? United States Supreme Court to decide question of first impression in Parker v. Bergy.
    Slade RJ; Van den Broder JM
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 7(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 11662797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patenting the human genome.
    Eisenberg RS
    Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):721-45. PubMed ID: 11653907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patent law: patentability of micro-organisms.
    Brennan AA
    Akron Law Rev; 1980; 14(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 11650627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patents--a live man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. Section 101.
    Fowler CF
    Drake Law Rev; 1980-1981; 30(3):635-49. PubMed ID: 11650556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patent law--patent on life form--man-made modification of microorganism is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101--Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 100 S.Ct. 2204 (1980).
    Vidas S
    Hamline Law Rev; 1981 Jan; 4(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 11650724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patenting life: no.
    Land RD; Mitchell CB
    First Things; 1996 May; 63():20-2. PubMed ID: 11654352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The gene patenting controversy: a convergence of law, economic interests, and ethics.
    Kevles DJ; Berkowitz A
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 12645549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Designer genes and patent law: a good fit.
    Bloom A
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1981; 26(4):1041-57. PubMed ID: 11652442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diamond v. Chakrabarty: living things as statutory subject matter.
    James ME
    North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 11650660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.