These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664067)
1. Abortion and Medicaid: the public funding dilemma--Zbaraz v. Quern. Price LR John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1979; 12(3):609-36. PubMed ID: 11664067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion. Hendrickson E Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Gray AD Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Illinois v. United States Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 772():329-35. PubMed ID: 11648364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection. Wilcox JK Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues. Yarbrough TE North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion. Butler PA Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion, Medicaid, and the Constitution. N Y Univ Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 54(1):120-60. PubMed ID: 11663947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall. Sewell CC; Wetterer MA KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions. Gunty S Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Tax-supported abortions: the legal issues. Schulte EJ Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11663586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae. Gold RB Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hope v. Perales: expanding medically necessary abortion rights of pregnant indigent women under New York and Nebraska state constitutional due process clauses. Brown M Neb Law Rev; 1993; 72(2):586-607. PubMed ID: 11656347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Departments of Labor and Health, Education, and Welfare, and related agencies appropriations, 1977--conference report. Magnuson WG Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1976 Sep; 122(141):S16112-21. PubMed ID: 11663737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton. Finn J Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. State constitutions as a source of individual liberties: expanding protection for abortion funding under Medicaid. Vuernick R J Contemp Law; 1993; 19(1):185-216. PubMed ID: 11652310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]