BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

568 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664072)

  • 1. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
    Hendrickson E
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
    Corns CA
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
    Yarbrough TE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: abortion funding restrictions as an unconstitutional condition.
    Sherman CW
    Calif Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 70(4):978-1013. PubMed ID: 11655731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade.
    Brock VM
    Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Gray AD
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Libby FA
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae.
    Gold RB
    Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
    Nishi J
    Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
    Butler PA
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. State constitutions as a source of individual liberties: expanding protection for abortion funding under Medicaid.
    Vuernick R
    J Contemp Law; 1993; 19(1):185-216. PubMed ID: 11652310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproductive freedom issues in legal services practice.
    Law S
    Clgh Rev; 1978 Nov; 12(7):389-403. PubMed ID: 11665039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
    Erca A
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amendment No. 2413 [(abortion funding[.
    Weicker LP
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Sep; 126(152):S13703-11. PubMed ID: 11664172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion--State Budget Act restricting circumstances under which public funds would be authorized to pay for abortions for Medi-Cal recipients held unconstitutional--Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers, 29 Cal. 3d 252, 625 P. 2d 779, 172 Cal. Rptr. 866 (1981).
    Harris DJ
    J Fam Law; 1981-1982; 20(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 11655656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
    Wilcox JK
    Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amendment No. 336.
    Bartlett DF
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The abortion funding conundrum: inalienable rights, affirmative duties, and the dilemma of dependence.
    Tribe LH
    Harv Law Rev; 1985 Nov; 99(1):330-43. PubMed ID: 11655827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.