These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664078)
1. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached. Slandell H Temple Law Q; 1979; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus. Wood MA; Hawkins LB Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions. Satris MJ Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe. Sendor BB Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions. Granfield D Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Judicial decision making and biological fact: Roe v. Wade and the unresolved question of fetal viability. Blank RH West Polit Q; 1984 Dec; 37(4):584-602. PubMed ID: 11655744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards a practical implementation of the abortion decision: the interests of the physician, the woman and the fetus. Sebek M De Paul Law Rev; 1976; 25(3):676-706. PubMed ID: 11664630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention. MacDougal D; Nasser WP Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Constitutional law--a new Constitutional right to an abortion. Watt RL North Carol Law Rev; 1973 Oct; 51(6):1573-84. PubMed ID: 11663419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy. Long SL; Ravenscraft P Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment. Destro RA Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change. Rubin ER North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and privacy. Wall St J (East Ed); 1973 Jan; ():12. PubMed ID: 11649086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes. Bartleman A West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade. Tapovatz WE St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]