These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664101)

  • 1. The quality of life: from Roe to Quinlan and beyond.
    Cincotta J
    Cathol Lawyer; 1979; 25(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 11664101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
    Dyke MC
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. byrn and Roe: the threshold question and juridical review.
    Riga PJ
    Cathol Lawyer; 1978; 23(4):309-31. PubMed ID: 11664059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill.
    Ruf BA
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion and the right to die: judicial imposition of a theory of life.
    Prygoski PJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1992; 23(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 11656225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting Roe v. Wade: substance and process in the abortion debate.
    Farrell MG
    Indiana Law J; 1993; 68(2):269-362. PubMed ID: 11656341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
    Riggs T
    San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
    Mayo TW
    MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die.
    Berman MB
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled.
    Loewy AH
    North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Privacy, abortion, and judicial review: haunted by the ghost of Lochner.
    Garfield H
    Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):293-365. PubMed ID: 11652501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roe v. Wade and In re Quinlan: individual decision and the scope of privacy's constitutional guarantee.
    Archbold P
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1977; 12(1):111-53. PubMed ID: 11663841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judicial decision making and biological fact: Roe v. Wade and the unresolved question of fetal viability.
    Blank RH
    West Polit Q; 1984 Dec; 37(4):584-602. PubMed ID: 11655744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morgentaler and American theories of judicial review: the Roe v. Wade debate in Canadian disguise?
    Crann GP
    Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1989; 47(2):499-525. PubMed ID: 11652618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
    Hyland WF; Baime DS
    Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Roe v. Wade: some definitional considerations.
    Nolan-Haley JM; Hilgers TW
    Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11662326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "A new Constitutional right": the Supreme Court and abortion.
    De Borst J
    Reform J; 1973 Apr; 23(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11663641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
    Bennett SA
    Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
    Haley JN
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Will there be a constitutional right to abortion after the reconsideration of Roe v. Wade?
    Bopp J
    J Contemp Law; 1989; 15(2):131-73. PubMed ID: 11655991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.