198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664107)
1. The case of Phillip Becker.
Destro RA; Moeller WA
Hum Life Rev; 1980; 6(4):81-98. PubMed ID: 11664107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Phillip Becker: another milestone--medical care and the mongoloid child.
Riga PJ
America (NY); 1980 Jul; 143(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 11665117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The case of Phillip Becker.
Will GF
Newsweek; 1980 Apr; 95(15):112. PubMed ID: 11658364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A new 'right-to-life' battleground opens over mentally retarded child.
Cannon L
Washington Post; 1979 Jul; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The outer limits of parental autonomy: withholding medical treatment from children.
Vorys YV
Ohio State Law J; 1981; 43(3):813-29. PubMed ID: 11658709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mental health and developmental disabilities code.
Illinois
Smith-Hurd Ill Annot Statut Ill; 1983-1984; ChaPter 91.1.2 Sections 1.100 to 6.107(Suppl):. PubMed ID: 12043648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding treatment: reflections on the Dawson case.
Browne A
Can Fam Physician; 1983 Aug; 29():1413-4. PubMed ID: 11658543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical decision making for and by children: tensions between parent, state, and child.
Wadlington W
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1994; 2():311-36. PubMed ID: 11659988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
Bates KW
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making?
Webster WL
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mourning the loss of a son.
Becker WM; Becker P
Newsweek; 1983 May; ():17. PubMed ID: 11658408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Phillip B. 8 May 1979.
California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4
Wests Calif Report; 1979; 156():48-52. PubMed ID: 11646091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Just what the doctor ordered: the role of unconventional therapy in the treatment of cancer in minors.
Grumet BR
Fam Law Q; 1980; 14(2):63-98. PubMed ID: 11665187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical treatment for minor children: the roles of parents, the state, the child, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Crutchfield CF
Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 11651710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Guardianship of Phillip B.
California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1
Wests Calif Report; 1983 Jan; 188():781-96. PubMed ID: 11648481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Children's rights: removing the parental consent barrier to medical treatment of minors.
Wilkins LP
Ariz State Law J; 1975; 1975(1):31-92. PubMed ID: 11664511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The choice to refuse or withhold medical treatment: the emerging technology and medical-ethical consensus.
Clarke AM
Creighton Law Rev; 1980; 13(3):795-841. PubMed ID: 11663088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-treatment in the best interests of the child: a case commentary of Couture-Jacquet v. Montreal Children's Hospital.
Keyserlingk EW
McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):413-36. PubMed ID: 11649873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
