519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664113)
1. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus.
Wood MA; Hawkins LB
Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe.
Sendor BB
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
Buckley M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
Barber RA
Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
Satris MJ
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
MacDougal D; Nasser WP
Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The abortion cases.
Rust ME
ABA J; 1986 Feb; 72():50-3. PubMed ID: 11655726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study.
Olmstead FH
Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. State protection of the viable unborn child after Roe v. Wade: how little, how late?
Rees G
LA Law Rev; 1976; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 11663713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion--an update.
Guthman HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
Linton PB
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Floyd v. Anders. 4 Nov 1977.
U.S. District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Fed Suppl; 1977; 440():535-40. PubMed ID: 11646007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
Minter CV
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement.
Jipping TL
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Constitutional law: further guidelines for abortion legislation.
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1976; 29(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 11664737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Survey of abortion law.
Platt JG; O'Malley K
Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life.
Parness JA; Pritchard SK
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
