311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664138)
1. Report urges freedom for genetic engineers.
New Sci; 1981 Apr; 90(1247):8. PubMed ID: 11664138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Conflicts of interest.
Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6236):664. PubMed ID: 11644385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Business and the academy.
Bok DC
Harv Mag; 1981; 83(5):23-35. PubMed ID: 11662883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA: have the corporations already grabbed control of new life forms?
Rifkin J
Mother Jones; 1977; 2(2):23-39. PubMed ID: 11649384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical and legal issues in patenting new animal life.
Dresser R
Jurimetrics; 1988; 28(4):399-435. PubMed ID: 11652544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Draft report to annual and central conferences, Dec 1990: an invitation to explore a frontier.
United Methodist Church. Genetic Science Task Force
Engage Soc Action; 1991 Jan; 4(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 11659313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research.
Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A
Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patenting of life forms.
Pautler G
Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):47-50, 76. PubMed ID: 11649513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patenting biology: DNA and oil-eaters.
Sci News; 1978 Mar; 113(11):167+. PubMed ID: 11661560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic engineering and related biotechnologies: scientific progress and public policy.
Perpich JG
Technol Soc; 1983; 5(1):27-49. PubMed ID: 11650684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposals on genetic technology: U.S. panel urges easing of regulation.
Andrews EL
N Y Times Web; 1991 Feb; ():D1, D7. PubMed ID: 11646818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The regulation of genetic engineering.
Breyer S; Zeckhauser R
Man Med; 1975; 1(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 12083123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the Human Genome Project at the interface between patent and FDA laws.
Cunningham BC
Risk; 1996; 7(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 11655078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. OTA: no new laws are needed to regulate certain gene therapies.
Krieger L
Am Med News; 1984 Dec; 27(48):2, 19. PubMed ID: 11653610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The status of recombinant DNA research.
Stevenson AE
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1978 Oct; 124(168):S19351-7. PubMed ID: 11661781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A commercial debut for DNA technology.
Bus Week; 1977 Dec; (2513):. PubMed ID: 11661586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. President's Commission urges changes in proposed regulations.
IRB; 1980 Nov; 2(9):9. PubMed ID: 11661888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. US genetic engineers cut through red tape.
New Sci; 1981 Jan; 89(1237):198. PubMed ID: 11664091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Innocuous inoculum or perilous parasite? Encouraging genetic research through patent grants: a call for regulation and debate.
Brashear JF
San Diego Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 18(2):263-99. PubMed ID: 11650644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The great 'recombinant DNA' controversy and the need for public debate.
Pearson M
Sci Forum; 1977 Jun; 10(3):3-4+. PubMed ID: 11650574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
