These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664150)
1. The US Supreme Court is wrong to disregard evidence on the harm of banning abortion. Nature; 2022 May; 605(7909):193-194. PubMed ID: 35513454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court Decision on Federal Prescribing Rules for Controlled Substances. Lamkin M JAMA; 2022 Oct; 328(15):1499-1500. PubMed ID: 36190715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. This US Supreme Court decision could derail Biden's climate plan. Tollefson J Nature; 2022 Mar; 603(7901):376-377. PubMed ID: 35241830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The US Supreme Court has gutted federal protection for wetlands - now what? Gardner RC Nature; 2023 Jun; 618(7964):215. PubMed ID: 37277599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US Supreme Court will review constitutionality of state bans on paediatric transgender care. Dyer O BMJ; 2024 Jun; 385():q1420. PubMed ID: 38918032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Criminalizing Homelessness - The Grants Pass, Oregon, Supreme Court Case. Keen R; Winkleby M N Engl J Med; 2024 Jun; 390(22):e57. PubMed ID: 38810183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The US Supreme Court and Future of Financing Dialysis Care. Worsley ML; Erickson KF Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):273-275. PubMed ID: 36754011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US Supreme Court again upholds Texas anti-abortion law but allows challenges. Tanne JH BMJ; 2021 Dec; 375():n3075. PubMed ID: 34906961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Irish Supreme Court upholds win for woman whose cervical cancer was missed. Dyer C BMJ; 2020 Mar; 368():m1196. PubMed ID: 32209545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. High Court upholds tribunal decision that surgeon was fit to practise despite lying to patient. Dyer C BMJ; 2019 Jul; 366():l4620. PubMed ID: 31289020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Special Court Negatives the Proposed Changes: Text of the Amendment. Criticism and Interruptions. The Questions of Amalgamation and Site. An Independent Committee to Select a Site. Hospital (Lond 1886); 1913 Dec; 55(1435):337-340. PubMed ID: 29840643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980). Brath MS Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Barnett BA Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]