These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664160)
21. Abortion and dialogue. Colker R Tulane Law Rev; 1989 Jun; 63(6):1363-403. PubMed ID: 11659218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Religion, morality and politics: the abortion debate]. Ladriere P Rev Fr Sociol; 1982; 23(3):417-54. PubMed ID: 12339249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Attitudes towards the abortion law in Germany, 1990-1992: determinants and political implications. Rattinger H Ger Polit; 1994 Aug; 3(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 11656499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion law diluted again in Germany. Karcher H BMJ; 1993 Jun; 306(6892):1566. PubMed ID: 11643141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Criminal abortion revisited. Buell SW N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Is a sociology of abortion possible?]. Isambert FA Rev Fr Sociol; 1982; 23(3):359-81. PubMed ID: 12339246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The constitutional morality of abortion. Brownstein A; Dau P Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. An analysis of the 1974 Massachusetts Abortion Statute and a minor's right to abortion. Malfa KA New Engl Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):417-54. PubMed ID: 11664438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Putting a stop to the abortion industry. Abse L Times (Lond); 1976 Jul; ():14. PubMed ID: 11649047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Turning the clock back is not the way to end abortion abuses. Short R Times (Lond); 1975 Feb; ():11. PubMed ID: 11649028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Tough abortion law provokes dismay in Poland. Darnton J N Y Times Web; 1993 Mar; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Normative judgment, social change, and legal reasoning in the context of abortion and privacy. Schnably SJ Rev Law Soc Change; 1984-1985; 13(4):715-910. PubMed ID: 11659092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The prize and the price of individual agency: another perspective on abortion and liberal government. Dunn KS Duke Law J; 1990 Feb; 1990(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 11656107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment. Witherspoon JS St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Criminal law--Texas Abortion Statute...violates due process clause of Fourteenth Amendment protecting right to privacy. Beaty MA Am J Crim Law; 1973; 2(2):231-43. PubMed ID: 11663506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A lesson in judicial abdication: Roe v. Arizona Board of Regents and the right of privacy. Sirkis JE Ariz State Law J; 1976; 1976(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 11663820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change. Rubin ER North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]