263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664216)
1. Eugenics and the law's obligation to man.
Weigel CL; Tinkler SE
South Tex Law J; 1973; 14(3):361-91. PubMed ID: 11664216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.
Diamond E
New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Futurity and permissibility of genetic engineering: the legal challenges.
Westra J
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1974; 1(3):499-509. PubMed ID: 11662950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic screening and counseling: the legal and ethical issues.
Waltz JR; Thigpen CR
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(4):696-768. PubMed ID: 11662927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness.
Baker JD
Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary sterilization: an unconstitutional menace to minorities and the poor.
Spriggs EJ
Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 11664642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Compulsory sterilization in India.
Warwick DP
Commonweal; 1976 Sep; 103(19):582-5. PubMed ID: 11660901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
Sangree S
Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Governmental control of research in positive eugenics.
Bass IS
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1974; 7(3):615-36. PubMed ID: 11661095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contraceptive sterilization: the need for state regulation.
Motley CE
Gold Gate Law Rev; 1975; 6(1):79-99. PubMed ID: 11661332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetics, eugenics, and public policy.
Smith GP
South Ill Univ Law J; 1985; 1985(3):435-53. PubMed ID: 11649816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward a quality population: China's eugenic sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Gewirtz DS
N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 1994; 15(1):139-62. PubMed ID: 11660194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal implications of amniocentesis.
Friedman JM
Univ PA Law Rev; 1974 Nov; 123(1):92-156. PubMed ID: 11664320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Manipulating the genetic code: jurisprudential conundrums.
Smith GP
Georgetown Law J; 1976 Feb; 64(3):697-733. PubMed ID: 11660899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Population control and abortion.
Freeman HA
Santa Clara Lawyer; 1973; 13(4):698-719. PubMed ID: 11663595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The politics of genetic engineering: who decides who's defective?
Ausubel F; Beckwith J; Janssen K
Psychol Today; 1974 Jun; 8(1):30+. PubMed ID: 11662940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sterilization: a remedy for the malady of child abuse?
Coyle CM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():245-62. PubMed ID: 11645621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Compulsory sterilization.
India. Maharashtra
Int Dig Health Legis; 1976; 27(4):779-88. PubMed ID: 11663701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The need for regulation of artificial insemination by donor.
Doren RJ
San Diego Law Rev; 1985; 22(5):1193-218. PubMed ID: 11658748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
