263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664216)
41. Sterilization abuse: a proposed regulatory scheme.
Kelly ME
De Paul Law Rev; 1979; 28(3):731-68. PubMed ID: 11661936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Beyond abortion: human genetics and the new eugenics.
Harding JR
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991; 18(1):471-512. PubMed ID: 11659992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Genetic testing, access to genetic data and discrimination: conceptual legislative models.
Brown B
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1573-92. PubMed ID: 11657048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. In opposition to an inclusive society?
Lyons C
Engage Soc Action; 1980 Feb; 8(2):42-8. PubMed ID: 11663112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Sterilization abuse: a proposed regulatory scheme.
De Paul Law Rev; 1979; 28(3):731-68. PubMed ID: 11661937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Health and eugenics practices: looking towards the future.
Romeo-Casabona CM
Eur J Health Law; 1998 Sep; 5(3):241-60. PubMed ID: 11657581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Population: the human rights approach.
Lee LT
Colo J Int Environ Law Policy; 1995; 6(2):327-44. PubMed ID: 11656672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Abortion in the courts: a laywoman's historical guide to the new disaster area.
Glen KB
Fem Stud; 1978 Feb; 4(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 11665010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Alcoholism: do threats and therapy mix?
Luks A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Dec; 12(6):7-11. PubMed ID: 7161082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The persistence of eugenics.
King D
Genethics News; 1998; No. 22():6-8. PubMed ID: 11657083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Legislative control of shock treatment.
Moore E
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 9(4):738-77. PubMed ID: 11664532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Legal implications of the world population plan of action.
Lee LT
J Int Law Econ; 1974 Dec; 9(3):375-417. PubMed ID: 11663648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
Coleman SS
S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. How can we make fewer children attractive?
Fremlin JH
Int J Environ Stud; 1974; 7(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 11661147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The role of the federal government in protecting citizens from communicable diseases.
Morgenstern MS
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1978; 47(4):537-71. PubMed ID: 11664964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Sterilization regulation: government efforts to guarantee informed consent.
Prendergast MH
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1978; 18(4):971-96. PubMed ID: 11665024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Expanding eugenics or improving health care in China: commentary on the Provisions of the Standing Committee of the Gansu People's Congress concerning the prohibition of reproduction by intellectually impaired persons.
Johnson L
J Law Soc; 1997 Jun; 24(2):199-234. PubMed ID: 11660617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Mass genetic screening programs and human values: another view--the danger of compulsion.
Lappé M
Med Dimens; 1973 Feb; 2(2):8+. PubMed ID: 11662986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
