447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664248)
1. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony.
Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Modern status of views as to general measure of physician's duty to inform patient of risks of proposed treatment.
Frantz LB
Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 88():1008-44. PubMed ID: 12091933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness.
Kopis WF
St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent.
Penhallegon JR
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed.
Kessenick LW; Mankin PA
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act.
Rosen MW
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability.
Wallach DM; Berry SJ
St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
Grubbs WG
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An inventory: the emerging rights of the physically ill family member.
Snowden RF
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1973; 6():133-59. PubMed ID: 11664269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments.
Murphy WJ
Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
Halligan PD
LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent and the patient's right to "no": Cobbs v. Grant.
Novack BB
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 6(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 11660977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient.
Rauzi E
Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976.
Curtis JV
KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions.
Seidelson DE
Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Survey of Washington law: informed consent needed for medical treatment.
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1974; 10(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 11664423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent: a changing standard of disclosure.
Eslami M
Conn Med; 1984 Jun; 48(6):407. PubMed ID: 11644146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New trends in informed consent?
Jaeckel LB
Neb Law Rev; 1975; 54(1):66-92. PubMed ID: 11664487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Shock therapy and psychiatric malpractice; the legal accomodation to a controversial treatment.
Krouner LW
J Forensic Sci Soc; 1973; 2():397-439. PubMed ID: 11664244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
