241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664272)
1. Artificial insemination.
Sagall EL
Trial; 1973; 9(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11664272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial insemination--a model statute.
Kamlet LG
Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(2):341-55. PubMed ID: 11661196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human artificial insemination and the law in Australia.
De Stoop DF
Aust Law J; 1976 Jun; 50(6):298-308. PubMed ID: 11664730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial insemination: problems, policies, and proposals.
Carr JE
Ala Law Rev; 1973; 26(1):120-62. PubMed ID: 11664270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal aspects of artificial insemination.
Shaman JM
J Fam Law; 1979; 18(2):331-51. PubMed ID: 11665122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Great expectations or convoluted realities: artificial insemination in flux.
Smith GP
Fam Law Rev; 1980; 3():37-44. PubMed ID: 11658615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Report from a test-tube baby.
Atallah L
N Y Times Mag; 1976 p 16-17+; 18 Apr 1976():. PubMed ID: 11664589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial insemination and surrogate motherhood--a nursery full of unresolved questions.
Harris LE
Willamette Law Rev; 1981; 17(4):913-52. PubMed ID: 11658334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial insemination: a legislative remedy.
Silvoso JA
West State Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(1):48-73. PubMed ID: 11665047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Human artificial insemination.
American Medical Association. Judicial Council
Conn Med; 1974 Sep; 38(9):481. PubMed ID: 11643564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal aspects of human and genetic engineering.
Rozovsky LE
Manit Law J; 1975; 6(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 11662232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In defense of surrogate parenting: a critical analysis of the recent Kentucky experience.
Phillips JW; Phillips SD
KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(4):877-931. PubMed ID: 11658606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogate motherhood and the baby-selling laws.
Katz A
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1986; 20(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11658800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A rejoinder.
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 11660336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The "legitimization" of artificial insemination: promise or problem?
Knoppers BM
Fam Law Rev; 1978 Apr; 1(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 11664957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act.
American Bar Association. Section of Family Law, Adoption Committee, and Ad Hoc Surrogacy Committee
Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):123-43. PubMed ID: 11659040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial insemination: disclosure issues.
Smith LA
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1979; 11(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 11665131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of legal parentage in egg donation, embryo transplantation, and gestational surrogacy arrangements.
Goodwin A
Fam Law Q; 1992; 26(3):275-91. PubMed ID: 11659602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Surrogate law: the decision in a novel case in New Jersey could have wide-reaching implications for infertile couples and surrogate motherhood.
Galen M
Natl Law J; 1986 Sep; 9(3):1, 8, 10. PubMed ID: 11658784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]