These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664295)
21. Guaranteeing the right to treatment. Hoffman PB; Dunn RC Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):7-11+. PubMed ID: 11662297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Civil commitment and the right to treatment. Kelly DS LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Mental health--the right to refuse drug therapy under "emergency restraint statutes". McGovern JJ New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):509-40. PubMed ID: 11664602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment. National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The rights of the mentally ill during incarceration: the developing law. Rastatter PC Univ Fla Law Rev; 1973; 25(3):494-520. PubMed ID: 11664236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Deprivation of liberty and the right to treatment. Bailey WS; Pyfer JF Clgh Rev; 1974 Jan; 7(9):519-28. PubMed ID: 11664309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question. Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents. Barnett CF Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Constitutional law--due process--right to treatment for nondangerous involuntarily civilly committed persons. Currie EJ Miss Law J; 1975; 46(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 11664483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of the court as mental health laws change. Flaschner FN Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Hospitalization and treatment procedures for the mentally ill. Georgia Code Ga Annot Ga; 1979; Sections 88-501 to 88-507.9():. PubMed ID: 12038432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The empirical consequences and policy implications of broadening the statutory criteria for civil commitment. Durham ML; La Fond JQ Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):395-446. PubMed ID: 11652469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Civil commitment decisionmaking: a report on one decisionmaker's experience. Morris GH South Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jan; 61(2):291-351. PubMed ID: 11659028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment. Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Judicially-ordered involuntary treatment of the mentally ill. Sullivan JL J Mo Bar; 1975 Jun; 31():254-8. PubMed ID: 11664534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of the opinions in Donaldson v. O'Connor and Wyatt v. Aderholt. Friedman P Ment Retard Law; 1974 Nov; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 11686181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Constitution v. the snakepit. Goodman W N Y Times Mag; 1974 p 21+; 17 Mar 1974():. PubMed ID: 11664311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Relief for the civilly committed: a constitutional right to treatment. Stage GL KY Law J; 1974-1975; 63(2):469-89. PubMed ID: 11664473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]