543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664312)
21. Judicial decisions in civil commitment: facts, attitudes, and psychiatric recommendations.
Hiday VA
Law Soc Rev; 1983; 17(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 11658694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Standards for involuntary civil commitment in Pennsylvania.
Meyers BA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1977; 38(3):535-49. PubMed ID: 11663030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
Grant GM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment.
Morris GH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment.
National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Civil commitment of the mentally ill: Lessard v. Schmidt.
Landis AH
De Paul Law Rev; 1974; 23(3):1276-97. PubMed ID: 11664582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature.
Morris GH
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Civil commitment and the right to treatment.
Kelly DS
LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A response to comments on APA's model commitment law.
Stone AA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Sep; 36(9):984-9. PubMed ID: 11643845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Mental disabilities law issues.
Epstein JM
Colo Lawyer; 1977 Dec; 6(12):2163-8. PubMed ID: 11663038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Senate Bill 26--mental patients' bill of rights.
Lynch FE; Neustrom PW
Washburn Law J; 1976; 16(1):149-60. PubMed ID: 11664695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process and the involuntarily civilly committed mental patient.
Wold SM
Tulsa Law J; 1976; 11(4):604-14. PubMed ID: 11664640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill.
Lundeen PA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Progress in involuntary commitment.
Campbell RE
Wash Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 49(2):617-46. PubMed ID: 11664399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A constitutional analysis of involuntary civil commitment in Wyoming.
Keiter RB
Land Water Law Rev; 1980; 15(1):141-206. PubMed ID: 11665248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Overt dangerous behavior as a constitutional requirement for involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Groethe R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1977; 44(3):562-93. PubMed ID: 11664853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Missouri's new mental health act: the problems with progress.
Staulcup VH
Wash Univ Law Q; 1979; 1979(1):209-33. PubMed ID: 11665135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code.
Dix GE
St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment.
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The new Ohio Mental Health Act.
Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ
Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
