543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664312)
41. Arkansas involuntary civil commitment: in the rear guard of the due process revolution.
Knight DA
Ark Law Rev; 1978; 32(2):294-346. PubMed ID: 11664973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The American Psychiatric Association's proposals on civil commitment.
Rubenstein LS
Clgh Rev; 1983 Oct; 17(5):558-62. PubMed ID: 11658653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The right to treatment for mentally ill juveniles in California.
Lovell JE
Hastings Law J; 1976 Mar; 27(4):865-93. PubMed ID: 11664617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Power, professionals, and arguments against civil commitment.
Page S
Prof Psychol; 1975 Nov; 6(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 11664528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Doe v. Gallinot.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Fed Report; 1981 Sep; 657():1017-25. PubMed ID: 11648460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Psychiatric hospitalization and the Constitution: some observation on emerging trends.
Reisner R
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 11664295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam.
Offir CW
Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's.
Perlin ML
Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Balancing the interests: the move towards less restrictive commitment of New York's mentally ill.
Cameron JD
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1988; 14(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 11659083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy.
Flaschner FN
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Conservatorship of Roulet: civil commitment and due process in California.
Klipstein DB; Weinroth DJ
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1979; 6(4):1061-106. PubMed ID: 11658279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The never-never land of mental health law: a review of the legal rights of youth committed by their parents to psychiatric facilities in California.
Hollar SS
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1989-1990; 4(2):300-15. PubMed ID: 11659276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views.
Hafemeister TL; Petrila J
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Beyond Rouse and Wyatt: an administrative law model for expanding and implementing the mental patient's right to treatment.
Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
Va Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 61(2):297-340. PubMed ID: 11664472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
Anderson K
Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Mental health law bibliography.
Wade MD
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1974; 6(1):314-40. PubMed ID: 11661142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Mental health law reform in Massachusetts.
Walker OS
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 53(5):986-1017. PubMed ID: 11664297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Law and the mentally ill.
Tanay E
Wayne Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 22(3):781-813. PubMed ID: 11664634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
Weissbourd R
John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
