137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664337)
1. A new right to treatment.
Fremouw WJ
J Psychiatry Law; 1974; 2(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 11664337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Postcommitment: an analysis and reevaluation of the right to treatment.
Foianini RA
Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Dec; 51(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11664723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Constitution v. the snakepit.
Goodman W
N Y Times Mag; 1974 p 21+; 17 Mar 1974():. PubMed ID: 11664311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Deprivation of liberty and the right to treatment.
Bailey WS; Pyfer JF
Clgh Rev; 1974 Jan; 7(9):519-28. PubMed ID: 11664309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to treatment and the psychiatric establishment.
Stone AA
Psychiatr Ann; 1974 Sep; 4(9):21-23+. PubMed ID: 11662954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Wyatt v. Aderholt. 8 Nov 1974.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1974; 503():1305-19. PubMed ID: 11646041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Voluntarily confined mental retardates: the right to treatment vs. the right to protection from harm.
Barshefsky C; Liebenberg R
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):787-805. PubMed ID: 11664363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. On the emancipation of mental patients.
Slovenko R; Luby ED
J Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(2):191-213. PubMed ID: 11664507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Miller HL
Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the opinions in Donaldson v. O'Connor and Wyatt v. Aderholt.
Friedman P
Ment Retard Law; 1974 Nov; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 11686181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.
Harv Law Rev; 1973 May; 86(7):1282-306. PubMed ID: 11664219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The limits of liberty: deinstitutionalization, homelessness, and libertarian theory.
Rhoden NK
Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):375-440. PubMed ID: 11653485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. For sale: the state of Alabama (A commentary on litigation and the institutionalized retarded).
Burton TA; Burton SF; Hirshoren A
J Spec Educ; 1977; 11(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11664776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views.
Hafemeister TL; Petrila J
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The new Ohio Mental Health Act.
Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ
Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
