These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664337)
21. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute. Vater JA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Relief for the civilly committed: a constitutional right to treatment. Stage GL KY Law J; 1974-1975; 63(2):469-89. PubMed ID: 11664473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Protecting the rights of the mentally handicapped through the courts. Marker GR Child Care Q; 1973; 2(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 11662957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Judicial implementation and Wyatt v. Stickney. Drake J Ala Law Rev; 1981; 32(2):299-312. PubMed ID: 11650546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of the court as mental health laws change. Flaschner FN Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Wyatt v. Stickney: rights of the committed. Prigmore CS; Davis PR Soc Work; 1973 Jul; 18(4):10-8. PubMed ID: 11662933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Wyatt v. Stickney: retrospect and prospect. Conference report. Byrne G Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1981 Feb; 32(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 11643660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Federal court order brings big changes in lives of mentally ill and retarded patients in Alabama. Shils J Wall St J (East Ed); 1973 Dec; ():42. PubMed ID: 11649160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The right to treatment for mentally ill juveniles in California. Lovell JE Hastings Law J; 1976 Mar; 27(4):865-93. PubMed ID: 11664617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment. Morris GH Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Adequate psychiatric treatment--a constitutional right? St. Thomas More Institute for Legal Research Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(4):322-45. PubMed ID: 11663404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Right to treatment for the civilly committed: a new Eighth Amendment basis. Roberts TD Univ Chic Law Rev; 1978; 45(3):731-52. PubMed ID: 11664970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reflections on the right to treatment. Perla GJ New Engl Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 11660953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded. Gallo LV Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Rockefeller. 10 Apr 1973. U.S. District Court, Eastern District, New York Fed Suppl; 1973 Apr; 357():752-770. PubMed ID: 11646030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In search of a sane commitment statute. Treffert DA; Krajeck RW Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]