These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664340)
21. Civil commitment in Wisconsin: the impact of Lessard v. Schmidt. Zander TK Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(2):503-62. PubMed ID: 11664748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy. Brooks AD Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Law and the mentally ill. Tanay E Wayne Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 22(3):781-813. PubMed ID: 11664634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Right to treatment for the civilly committed: a new Eighth Amendment basis. Roberts TD Univ Chic Law Rev; 1978; 45(3):731-52. PubMed ID: 11664970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam. Offir CW Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals. Anderson K Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Legal rights of the mentally impaired. Dowben C Houst Law Rev; 1979 May; 16(4):833-901. PubMed ID: 11651659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Civil commitment and the right to treatment. Kelly DS LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Rights of involuntarily committed mental patients--freedom or treatment? Howard SW Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1975; 4(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11662235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment. Grant GM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethical issues in inpatient practice. Sider RC Psychiatr Med Update Mass Gen Hosp Rev Physicians; 1986; 4(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 11659331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Disaffirmance of the right to treatment doctrine: a new juncture in juvenile justice. Levine RS Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1980; 41(2):159-204. PubMed ID: 11665223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Accommodating patient rights and computerized mental health systems. Gobert JJ North Carol Law Rev; 1976 Jan; 54(2):153-87. PubMed ID: 11664607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill. Muller MJ Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. State in Interest of R.G.W. 20 Oct 1976. New Jersey. Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, Passaic County Atl Report; 1976; 366():1375-85. PubMed ID: 11645914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment--absent treatment, a nondangerous mentally ill person able to survive safely in society has a constitutional right to release. Burnstin SM Wash Law Rev; 1976 Jul; 51(3):764-90. PubMed ID: 11664654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Report of the U.S. Delegation to Assess Recent Changes in Soviet Psychiatry. United States Delegation to Assess Recent Changes in Soviet Psychiatry Schizophr Bull; 1990 Apr; 15(4 Suppl):1-79. PubMed ID: 11659290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The civilly-committed public mental patient and the right to aftercare. Saphire RB Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 4(2):232-95. PubMed ID: 11664639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]