267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664363)
1. Voluntarily confined mental retardates: the right to treatment vs. the right to protection from harm.
Barshefsky C; Liebenberg R
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):787-805. PubMed ID: 11664363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to treatment and the psychiatric establishment.
Stone AA
Psychiatr Ann; 1974 Sep; 4(9):21-23+. PubMed ID: 11662954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Constitution v. the snakepit.
Goodman W
N Y Times Mag; 1974 p 21+; 17 Mar 1974():. PubMed ID: 11664311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Federal court order brings big changes in lives of mentally ill and retarded patients in Alabama.
Shils J
Wall St J (East Ed); 1973 Dec; ():42. PubMed ID: 11649160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Deprivation of liberty and the right to treatment.
Bailey WS; Pyfer JF
Clgh Rev; 1974 Jan; 7(9):519-28. PubMed ID: 11664309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Postcommitment: an analysis and reevaluation of the right to treatment.
Foianini RA
Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Dec; 51(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11664723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues in inpatient practice.
Sider RC
Psychiatr Med Update Mass Gen Hosp Rev Physicians; 1986; 4(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 11659331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.
Harv Law Rev; 1973 May; 86(7):1282-306. PubMed ID: 11664219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Miller HL
Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A new right to treatment.
Fremouw WJ
J Psychiatry Law; 1974; 2(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 11664337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The limits of liberty: deinstitutionalization, homelessness, and libertarian theory.
Rhoden NK
Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):375-440. PubMed ID: 11653485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Justiciability and mental health.
LaRue LH
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1975; 32(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 11662970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rights of institutionalized mental patients: issues, implications, and proposed guidelines.
Wildgen JS
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 11663733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The rights of the mentally ill during incarceration: the developing law.
Rastatter PC
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1973; 25(3):494-520. PubMed ID: 11664236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to treatment for mentally ill juveniles in California.
Lovell JE
Hastings Law J; 1976 Mar; 27(4):865-93. PubMed ID: 11664617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
