These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664368)

  • 1. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father?
    Georgius EH
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion: the father's rights.
    Gilbert RA
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade.
    Tapovatz WE
    St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The husband's rights in abortion.
    Etzioni A
    Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say?
    Diggins M
    Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice.
    Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL; Ravenscraft P
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restrictions on women's right to abortion: informed consent, spousal consent, and record keeping provisions.
    Karg B
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1978; 5(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 11665035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the courts to stop abortion by injunction: Mock v. Brandanburg.
    Martin SL
    Can J Women Law; 1989-1990; 3(2):569-83. PubMed ID: 11659311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
    Allen AL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
    Witherspoon JP
    Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond roe and doe: the rights of the father.
    Sherain H
    Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Feb; 50(3):483-95. PubMed ID: 11663632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The father's rights in the abortion decision.
    Schultz WL
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1975; 6(3):1075-94. PubMed ID: 11664508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision.
    Sanders JE
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law.
    Baylson MM
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revisiting Roe v. Wade: substance and process in the abortion debate.
    Farrell MG
    Indiana Law J; 1993; 68(2):269-362. PubMed ID: 11656341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constitutional law--abortion--court focuses on husband's interest regarding spousal notification requirement to procure abortion: Scheinberg v. Smith, 659 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1981).
    Adams C
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1982-1983; 13(1):143-59. PubMed ID: 11658434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics.
    Heymann PB; Barzelay DE
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The family at bay.
    DeMarco D
    Hum Life Rev; 1982; 8(4):44-54. PubMed ID: 11651705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.